Good Morning
Today's Reading: Revelation 14:2:4a , Barclay 118-122 (two sections)
-- two very different sections from Barclay today.
-- one thing I will note -- that in the normal reading of Revelation, without a study guide, you would normally just gloss over this passage as your read to find out what else happens. Readers have just come off a couple of chapters with beasts and marks of the beast and you want to know what else happens. I know that is true in my case, but I don't really ever remember reading any of this.
-- the first passage from today, Barclays does a very good job in making us pay attention to the fact of how John describes the voice of God. Think about that -- the voice of God, in heaven, how majestic and powerful and melodic that must sound. John really makes a point of trying to find the words to write that down.
-- also in this passage is the idea about the new song that these elect of God learn, and how only they could learn that song. An interesting take of the priviledge afforded to those who are God's chosen people, that not only would they get to praise God, but would get to praise him with a song that only they could learn.
-- the second passage is a really, really tough one, in that it just flies in the face of everything that we think we know and believe. We have talked off and on through this study as to the number 144,000, and whether it was a literal number or a symbolic number (and generally believing that it was a symbolic number, and that hopefully we would be included "in that number" when and if the time came for that during our lifetime.
-- now we find out, that apparently that this 144,000 is all male (which Barclay didn't really address that conclusion at all) and that they were virgins. There is a train of thought that that statement is symbolic, and that it refers to spiritual purity and faithfulness. But to me, it just seems too plain spoken and straightforward. Barclay works around different approaches, and really comes to the conclusion that we should set it aside -- that either John wrote it, but it is simply so much at odds with the rest of the New Testament that we need to say that it isn't correct, or that it was just some random note that was put down by an early scribe, and then was incorrectly copied into later copies of the book of Revelation.
-- I may be old-fashioned on this, but I just don't believe that God would be so haphazard about his word, his book, that he would allow (1) the original writers to mess up and write something wrong or (2) allow a major typo to permanently creep into the text. My take is that we just haven't thought about it enough to discern what God meant when he had John write this. I think that might be because Revelation scholars want, just like we do, to get to the good parts -- the plagues, the locusts and all of the other elements that make Revelation, Revelation. But I just don't think we can do what Barclay is doing, which is to look at a passage in the Bible and simply decide, on our own, that it is wrong and should be ignored.
-- For what its worth, in my Bible, the NIV version, the passage reads that "These are those who did not defile themselves with women, for they kept themselves pure." It doesn't really mention virginity, but purity. It could be that the passage is talking about sexual faithfulness, not sexual abstinance. I have a hard time buying the symbolism about spiritual faithfulness and purity -- it just is too straightforward. And while throughout the Bible we sort of make references to 'man' and 'men' more gender - inclusive, in this particular instance, it is a little more difficult to say that John meant to include men and women in this passage.
-- So, what's your take?
Today's Scripture
As he who called you in holy, be holy yourselves in all your conduct.
1 Peter 1:15
Today's prayer requests: Saundra Aaron Valerie's brother's mother-in-law continues to go through treatment for cancer. Need to remember her and her family in her struggles
Today's class member prayer: